• <center id="my6c6"></center>
    <rt id="my6c6"><acronym id="my6c6"></acronym></rt>
  • <abbr id="my6c6"></abbr>
  •  

    上海強世信息科技有限公司

    Placebo response changes depending on the neuropathic pain syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    作者: | 發布:Cepeda MS, Berlin JA, Gao CY, Wiegand F, Wada DR. | 發布時間: 2012-04-13 | 322 次瀏覽 | 分享到:
    Objective: To compare placebo responses in neuropathic pain syndromes.

    Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

    Setting and patients: Randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing pain intensity or pain relief in any neuropathic pain syndrome published since 1995 with ≥5days follow-up.

    Interventions: Placebo response.

    Outcome measures: Pain intensity and responder rates (proportion reporting ≥50% pain relief). Meta-regression models were built.

    Results: Ninety-four studies (N=5,317) were included in the pain intensity analysis; 47 studies (N=3,087) were included in the responder analysis. After controlling for potential confounders (e.g., subject characteristics, study design characteristics), the placebo response was found to be large and varied with the pain syndrome. Compared with diabetic neuropathic/polyneuropathic pain (DPN), the placebo response for a decline in pain intensity and responder rate was smaller in trials that assessed central pain and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and larger in trials that assessed HIV pain. The model-predicted mean decrease (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in pain intensity (0-10 scale) was as follows: DPN, 1.45 (1.35 to 1.55); PHN, 1.16 (1.03 to 1.29); central pain, 0.44 (-0.41 to 1.30); HIV pain, 1.82 (1.51 to 2.12). The predicted responder rates (95% CI) were as follows: DPN, 20% (14.6 to 25.8); PHN, 11.5% (8.4 to 14.5); central pain, 7.2% (2.1 to 12.3); HIV pain, 42.8% (34.9 to 50.7). The type of treatment in the active arm also influenced the placebo response.

    Conclusions: Placebo response is influenced by the pain syndrome evaluated. These differences should be considered when evaluating novel compounds for the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions.

    Pain Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):575-95.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22390269/

    国产成年无码久久久久下载| 久久久久女人精品毛片九一| 久久99这里只有精品国产| 久久国产乱子精品免费女| 国产精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 午夜不卡888久久| 国内精品久久人妻互换| 成人久久久观看免费毛片| 91久久亚洲国产成人精品性色| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久秋霞2| 伊人色综合久久天天人守人婷| 97久久精品无码一区二区天美| 色狠狠久久AV五月综合| 久久香蕉国产线看观看亚洲片| 久久夜色精品国产www| 国产一区二区精品久久91| 97久久天天综合色天天综合色hd| 久久久一本精品99久久精品66| 国产综合久久久久| 久久无码一区二区三区少妇| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久久| 伊人久久精品一区二区三区| 久久亚洲sm情趣捆绑调教| 婷婷五月深深久久精品| 久久久综合九色合综国产精品 | 久久精品国产久精国产果冻传媒 | 亚洲综合久久久久久中文字幕| 久久国产乱子伦精品免| 久久99精品综合国产首页| 久久露脸国产精品| 久久精品国产国产精品四凭| 性高朝久久久久久久久久| 大伊人青草狠狠久久| 国产做a爰片久久毛片a| 国产精品美女久久久久av超清| 久久精品国产亚洲av瑜伽| 亚洲精品无码久久久久A片苍井空| 99久久免费国产香蕉麻豆| 精品国产乱码久久久久软件 | 国产午夜久久精品| 亚洲精品综合久久|