• <center id="my6c6"></center>
    <rt id="my6c6"><acronym id="my6c6"></acronym></rt>
  • <abbr id="my6c6"></abbr>
  •  

    上海強世信息科技有限公司

    Placebo response changes depending on the neuropathic pain syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    作者: | 發布:Cepeda MS, Berlin JA, Gao CY, Wiegand F, Wada DR. | 發布時間: 2012-04-13 | 322 次瀏覽 | 分享到:
    Objective: To compare placebo responses in neuropathic pain syndromes.

    Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

    Setting and patients: Randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing pain intensity or pain relief in any neuropathic pain syndrome published since 1995 with ≥5days follow-up.

    Interventions: Placebo response.

    Outcome measures: Pain intensity and responder rates (proportion reporting ≥50% pain relief). Meta-regression models were built.

    Results: Ninety-four studies (N=5,317) were included in the pain intensity analysis; 47 studies (N=3,087) were included in the responder analysis. After controlling for potential confounders (e.g., subject characteristics, study design characteristics), the placebo response was found to be large and varied with the pain syndrome. Compared with diabetic neuropathic/polyneuropathic pain (DPN), the placebo response for a decline in pain intensity and responder rate was smaller in trials that assessed central pain and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and larger in trials that assessed HIV pain. The model-predicted mean decrease (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in pain intensity (0-10 scale) was as follows: DPN, 1.45 (1.35 to 1.55); PHN, 1.16 (1.03 to 1.29); central pain, 0.44 (-0.41 to 1.30); HIV pain, 1.82 (1.51 to 2.12). The predicted responder rates (95% CI) were as follows: DPN, 20% (14.6 to 25.8); PHN, 11.5% (8.4 to 14.5); central pain, 7.2% (2.1 to 12.3); HIV pain, 42.8% (34.9 to 50.7). The type of treatment in the active arm also influenced the placebo response.

    Conclusions: Placebo response is influenced by the pain syndrome evaluated. These differences should be considered when evaluating novel compounds for the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions.

    Pain Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):575-95.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22390269/

    亚洲精品国产美女久久久| 亚洲中文字幕无码久久| 久久99精品国产麻豆宅宅| 伊人久久精品午夜| 国产成人久久精品一区二区三区 | 欧美成人秋霞久久AA片| 97久久精品人妻人人搡人人玩| 久久亚洲AV成人无码国产电影| 久久精品国产清自在天天线| 精品一区二区久久久久久久网站| 精品熟女少妇a∨免费久久| 久久久久久精品无码人妻| 国产精品久久久香蕉| 久久这里只精品99re免费| 色综合久久天天综合绕观看| 国产亚洲精午夜久久久久久 | 亚洲中文字幕无码久久精品1| 91精品久久久久久久久网影视| 久久男人中文字幕资源站| 免费国产99久久久香蕉| 精品久久久中文字幕二区| 亚洲精品99久久久久中文字幕 | 国产精品一久久香蕉国产线看| 天天拍夜夜添久久精品| 国内精品伊人久久久久AV影院| 色综合久久综合网| 99久久久国产精品免费牛牛 | 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区久久| 久久福利视频导航| 久久精品人人槡人妻人人玩| 国产69精品久久久久妇女| 久久精品国产导航| 777午夜精品久久av蜜臀| 亚洲级αV无码毛片久久精品| 久久偷看各类wc女厕嘘嘘| 精品久久洲久久久久护士| 久久久久久久综合| 久久男人中文字幕资源站| 久久国产精品亚洲一区二区| 91精品无码久久久久久五月天| 日本久久久精品中文字幕|