• <center id="my6c6"></center>
    <rt id="my6c6"><acronym id="my6c6"></acronym></rt>
  • <abbr id="my6c6"></abbr>
  •  

    上海強世信息科技有限公司

    Placebo response changes depending on the neuropathic pain syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    作者: | 發(fā)布:Cepeda MS, Berlin JA, Gao CY, Wiegand F, Wada DR. | 發(fā)布時間: 2012-04-13 | 295 次瀏覽 | 分享到:
    Objective: To compare placebo responses in neuropathic pain syndromes.

    Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

    Setting and patients: Randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing pain intensity or pain relief in any neuropathic pain syndrome published since 1995 with ≥5days follow-up.

    Interventions: Placebo response.

    Outcome measures: Pain intensity and responder rates (proportion reporting ≥50% pain relief). Meta-regression models were built.

    Results: Ninety-four studies (N=5,317) were included in the pain intensity analysis; 47 studies (N=3,087) were included in the responder analysis. After controlling for potential confounders (e.g., subject characteristics, study design characteristics), the placebo response was found to be large and varied with the pain syndrome. Compared with diabetic neuropathic/polyneuropathic pain (DPN), the placebo response for a decline in pain intensity and responder rate was smaller in trials that assessed central pain and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and larger in trials that assessed HIV pain. The model-predicted mean decrease (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in pain intensity (0-10 scale) was as follows: DPN, 1.45 (1.35 to 1.55); PHN, 1.16 (1.03 to 1.29); central pain, 0.44 (-0.41 to 1.30); HIV pain, 1.82 (1.51 to 2.12). The predicted responder rates (95% CI) were as follows: DPN, 20% (14.6 to 25.8); PHN, 11.5% (8.4 to 14.5); central pain, 7.2% (2.1 to 12.3); HIV pain, 42.8% (34.9 to 50.7). The type of treatment in the active arm also influenced the placebo response.

    Conclusions: Placebo response is influenced by the pain syndrome evaluated. These differences should be considered when evaluating novel compounds for the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions.

    Pain Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):575-95.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22390269/

    成人国内精品久久久久一区| 狠狠色狠狠色综合久久| 精品伊人久久香线蕉| 曰产无码久久久久久精品| 少妇久久久久久人妻无码| 狠狠色丁香婷婷久久综合| avtt香蕉久久| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉综合图片| 国产精品久久久久久吹潮| 香蕉久久一区二区不卡无毒影院| 97精品国产91久久久久久久| 亚洲综合久久精品无码色欲| 久久精品视频16| 精品免费久久久久久久| 精品午夜久久网成年网| 99久久免费精品高清特色大片| 久久综合色天天久久综合图片| 手机看片久久高清国产日韩| 久久精品国产一区二区三区日韩| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码麻豆| 伊人久久久久久久久久| 国产精品96久久久久久久| 国内精品久久久久影院免费| 四虎国产精品成人免费久久| 国产精品久久久久免费a∨| 久久婷婷五月综合色奶水99啪| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合电影| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕| .精品久久久麻豆国产精品| 久久久久国产亚洲AV麻豆| 久久夜色精品国产网站| 久久九九亚洲精品| 国内精品免费久久影院| 伊人色综合久久天天网 | 久久久久成人片免费观看蜜芽| 2021久久国自产拍精品| 亚洲AV无码1区2区久久| 久久国产精品亚洲综合| 日本久久久久中文字幕| 人妻尝试又大又粗久久| 国产精品久久波多野结衣|